Subject: RE: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie <eom>
From: "Debbi Ramacciotti" <[email-masked]>
To: "The New Improved Less Lame List" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:30:26 -0700

Pay attention to the fucking thread and you'll figure it out.  You're
good like that. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Earles [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:30 AM
To: The New Improved Less Lame List
Subject: Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie <eom>

Which Kim?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Debbi" <[email-masked]>
To: "'The New Improved Less Lame List'" <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: RE: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie <eom>

> Great question!  If you're looking for serious answers, blinders like 
> Kim's are a pretty good start.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie <eom>
>
>
> Ok then, why do only about 3 people see Weathered as the 
> "rush-to-market" album that it most definitely was and why does the 
> rest of the confused world refuse to see the colossal potential in the

> album that wasn't realized?
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:58:05 -0700 "Debbi" <[email-masked]> 
> writes:
> > Really.  I'd rather talk about why only about 3 people see weathered

> > as the "rush to market" album that it was and why the rest of the
> > world
> > refuses to see the colossal potential in the album that wasn't
> > realized.
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list,
visit:
> http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm

To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list,
visit: http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm

To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list,
visit:
http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm